Time to plant a tree

by Admin 1. January 2009 23:15
 

 

Time to plant a tree:
marketing and the downturn

The troubled economic climate raises the stakes for marketing as the cutting edge of any medtech company’s business strategy. As marketing experts Baba Awopetu, Timo Fotheringham and Princewill Osaro Omorogiuwa explain, this is a make or break time: those stuck in the mud will lose, but those who can get to grips with the challenges will profit from the tough competition that lies ahead.

The sudden change in the economic climate has impacted on most industries and functions. Slowdown in sales, shift from profits to losses, redundancies and closing down sales are some of the symptoms of the most severe economic challenge for a generation. How does this affect the healthcare environment? Traditionally the healthcare market is insulated from market forces that affect other industries – but it’s important for medical technology companies to take note of these dramatic changes. In truth, there will not be a better opportunity for us to rethink our business model and practices. This article looks at some of the changes that marketers need to consider.

The bright side

First things first: the fundamentals of our business are good, so there are plenty of reasons for optimism. Though times are tough and adjustments will not be easy, there are upsides for those who can adapt. Demographics, lifestyles and expectations all mean that the underlying demand for our services remains strong. That’s the good news.

The bad news, for some, is that inauthentic marketing organisations will come under increasing pressure. The current scenario offers opportunities for genuine marketers, but will make life harder for the imposters. Value delivered to stakeholders will come under increasing scrutiny – so if you are delivering value you will thrive; if not, you are likely to be found out. In short, the lesson of the business environment is that product orientation and hard selling will not suffice!

Marketers, like other functions, are being asked to do more with less. Since it is not possible to do more of the same with fewer resources, it is crucial that we do the right things. This means that marketers need to go back to basics and make sure they get the fundamentals of marketing right. Although the current economic climate makes the life of most marketing professionals more difficult, at the same time it facilitates changes within organisations as senior management becomes aware of the need to evolve. This is an opportunity to make lasting changes and set the course for a successful future.

There are several areas where, in our view, marketers can differentiate themselves from the pack and thrive in this cold climate.

Segment or die

Segmentation in the medical technology arena is a myth: most talk about it, but very few do it. Now is the time to adopt this arguably most fundamental principle of marketing in practice. Marketing is all about ensuring that an organisation effectively identifies and meets the needs of customers profitably. Products and services are designed to meet needs, and the extent to which customer needs vary is the extent to which we need to segment markets.

Half a century or so ago, the rail industry hit a difficult patch as its growth slowed significantly. The reason it stopped growing was not that people did not need transportation any longer, but that their needs were being served better by alternatives such as cars and aeroplanes. In more recent times, the need for portable music on the go has not diminished: it has just moved from the Walkman to the MP3 player and, more recently, to the mobile phone. These examples show that although customer needs have not changed significantly, new technologies have been used to serve them better.

Companies have started to realise that product orientation is doomed to failure in the long term. As current events surrounding the US automotive industry show, producing goods that customers don’t want can be very costly and even threaten a major organisation’s existence. Though customer orientation has proved to be a far more effective approach, it is like trying to push water uphill if it is not accompanied with an authentic approach to segmentation. Without an accurate understanding of the needs we are trying to meet, how can we hope to serve them well?

It is time for us to get back to basics: to understand the needs we are serving, and define and segment our markets properly. You can segment a market without serving it effectively – but you cannot serve a market effectively without segmenting it. The future winners in the healthcare industry will have identified real segments in their market, and will have solutions that satisfy the needs of their target segments.

To brand or not to brand

We are obsessed with branding, rather than the critical art of brand building. However, this subtle difference in terminology has a huge impact on our business. Brands matter, we are told, and they do. Those who have real brands will benefit in the coming months and years, and those who do not will be found out. Nonetheless, the opportunity is there to engage in the difficult but rewarding task of brand building. Branding is about identification, naming, signs and symbols. Brand building is concerned with delivering consistent and deliberate value that is reinforced to the customers through marketing communications.

Too many marketers are heavily into the visibility that branding affords, and too few get stuck into the more rewarding activity of building brands by delivering value. Marketers need to step back from our current obsession with communicating product features, and instead lead the brand building process. Future success will be based on compelling propositions, which can only be made by those who are actively engaged in brand building. In short, we need to spend more time building the house and less time painting it.

An old proverb says: The best time to plant a tree is twenty years ago. The second best time is now. Realising the essential principles of marketing through segmentation, brand building and strategic planning will enable medical technology companies to come out of this crisis stronger than they were before.

Time to innovate

We love innovation, and rightly so – but is it time to rethink innovation? Most of our innovation is product-focused and R&D driven, but there is a need for marketers to play a bigger role in this field. Engineers left to their own (medical) devices will surely innovate; however, the new products risk being stillborn if they are not marketorientated. It is thus vital for marketers, who have a deep understanding of their customers, to be part of the innovation process and guide the new product in the right direction.

The critical point here is that we need to move away from an emphasis on ‘clever’ features and ‘brainwave’ technologies that do not deliver real value to customers – totally differentiated, yet totally irrelevant! The innovations that count are born out of an identified customer problem, and thus are customer-focused. When our marketing processes are working effectively, the whole organisation – including the engineers – belongs to the marketing team. In today’s market, where the voice for value is getting louder and louder, there is no room for innovations that are not customer-focused.

The other opportunity to optimise our innovations is by effectively managing their diffusion. Too often, the level of brainpower that goes into developing the innovation is not applied when it is time to take the innovation to market. All customers are not equal, and identifying and understanding the various adoption categories (as defined by Everett Rogers) is vital to the successful diffusion of innovation. Many viable innovations fail due to a poor understanding of how to diffuse them and create a ‘buzz’ in the market. Many papers have been published on this subject, including empirical research within the healthcare arena. Given the role that new products play in most of our business strategies, getting up to speed in this regard is no longer optional.

The current scenario offers opportunities for genuine marketers, but will make life harder for the imposters. Value delivered to stakeholders will come under increasing scrutiny – so if you are delivering value you will thrive; if not, you are likely to be found out. In short, product orientation and hard selling will not suffice!

I have a plan

We all have a plan... but now, more than ever, our plans are facing a real test. For those who perform yearly rituals mislabelled as planning, the game is up. The idea that planning is about bringing the future into the present, so that we can do something about it, has never been more crucial than now. As the old axiom goes: Only when the tide goes in do we know who is swimming without a swimming costume. The current business environment will expose those who think scenario planning and blue sky thinking are team-building exercises.

Even copycats may appear to be successful when nothing changes. But when the environment changes in major ways, only those who plan and strategise will survive. The questions being asked today require real answers, and will drive a change in orientation for many healthcare marketers. We need to get back to basics, take planning seriously and broaden our scope to allow for all contingencies. Change is inevitable, so we should look for the first signs of it.

As the economy plunges further into recession, it becomes clear that all companies should have made changes two or three years ago in order to be competitive now. Many have missed that opportunity – but the good news is that it is not too late. Another old proverb says: The best time to plant a tree is twenty years ago. The second best time is now. Realising the essential principles of marketing through segmentation, brand building and strategic planning will enable medical technology companies to come out of this crisis stronger than they were before.

Baba Awopetu ( btawopetu@yahoo.co.uk) is a visiting lecturer at the Marketers’ Forum. Timo Fotheringham ( timo.fotheringham@googlemail.com) is an international marketer who specialises in CRM. Princewill Osaro Omorogiuwa ( princewill@yahoo.co.uk) is a visiting lecturer at the London School of Marketing and CEO of the Simon Page Business School.

 

Tags:

Medtech Features

Events

by Admin 1. January 2009 23:10
 

 

Medica 2008: Beating the crunch
Düsseldorf, Germany, 19–22 November, 2009


Medica is the world’s largest annual trade fair for healthcare technologies. Defying the financial crisis, Medica 2008 attracted 137,000 trade visitors and over 4300 exhibitors: a level of attendance on a par with the previous year. The event included ComPaMED 2008, a trade fair for suppliers to medical manufacturing.

Medica offers a major platform for healthcare technology companies to showcase their innovations. Exhibitors presented a complete spectrum of new products, services and processes for use in doctors’ surgeries and hospitals. In addition to areas of persistent high interest, such as medical device technology, there was increased demand for physiotherapeutic processes and medical IT.

Medica is one of the sector’s leading events for decision-makers, with almost 90% of this year’s trade visitors involved in relevant investment decisions (at least in a consultative capacity). Many exhibitors reported that the audience displayed a high propensity to invest.

Economy drive

“During a credit crunch investments are questioned with an especially critical eye,” said Wilhelm Niedergöker, Managing Director at Messe Düsseldorf. “The trade audience at Medica and Compamed took a particular interest in efficient processes for streamlining treatment.” Notable examples include telemedicine applications for radiology and pathology, which allow image data for diagnosis to be transmitted fast and conveniently to experts at distant locations via clinical networks.

The UK Pavilion at Medica

In addition to the improved networking of healthcare professionals brought about by hardware and software applications, there is an increasing trend towards compact medical devices that are suitable for mobile deployment. For example, the world’s smallest heart-lung machine (which fits doctor-manned ambulances and helicopters) was showcased at Medica 2008.

High-tech at ComPaMED

In parallel with Medica, 519 exhibitors presented the best of component technology at ComPaMED. Upstream suppliers for medical manufacturing presented an impressive array of new materials, components, packaging solutions and microtechnology processes. The exhibition drew the interest of 15,000 trade visitors.

ComPaMED 2008 reflected the growing trend among suppliers not just to supply individual components, but to assume the role of a subcontractor for complete medical devices and products. It also reflected the increasing use of plastics in medical devices, and the use of laserbased and other new technologies to join plastic components with components made of metal or ceramics.

ABHI at Medica 2008

ABHI, an official UKTI-accredited trade association, co-ordinates the UK Pavilion at Medica. This year it took around 100 companies there – a record for ABHI, demonstrating the continued strength of the medtech sector in the UK.

Medica is a crucial event for British firms looking to maintain or build a strong export presence. Despite the current economic climate, many ABHI exhibitors commented that the number and quality of contacts made at the show were as good as in previous years. The leads taken at the ABHI stand are now being advertised through its website and International Newswire.

ABHI at Medica welcomed Minister for Trade Gareth Thomas, who spent over an hour at the British Pavilion. This visit gave ABHI exhibitors an opportunity to discuss the issues currently facing the medical technology sector, such as the need for continuing Government assistance for British firms looking to export, the availability of soft loans to British firms for specific overseas projects, and the importance of innovation by SMEs in the UK healthcare sector.

Northwest passage

The world’s first manually retractable hypodermic needle, launched by Sheffieldbased InterVene Ltd, and a range of highly adherent surgical sealant films unveiled by Tissuemed Ltd were among the innovations on display from Yorkshire companies at Medica 2008.

Medilink Yorkshire and Humber (Y&H) – a professional association supporting the growth of the healthcare technology sector in the region – ran the UKTI-sponsored Yorkshire and Humber pavilion (part of the UK pavilion), helping companies to showcase their products and source new partnerships.

Charlotte Fraser, International Manager at Medilink Y&H and regional specialist for UKTI, said: “We have been attending Medica on behalf of Yorkshire and Humber for nine years now. Being the eyes and ears of the healthcare technology sector, we work closely with UKTI to offer companies support in accessing global markets and help support the growth of healthcare technologies across the region.”

Other UK regions were represented by companies such as Cheshire-based Advanced Medical Solutions (AMS), who displayed their range of wound care and wound closure products; and Telfordbased Hydro Physio, who showcased their new range of accessories for the Lifestyle hydro treadmill.

Medical Futures Innovation Awards 2008
London, 2 December 2008www.medicalfutures.co.uk


The healthcare technologies of the future were recognised at the Medical Futures Innovation Awards 2008, a showcase of UK innovations that could transform patient care. Awards were presented for a range of novel products and services including an injectable bone graft, a dental imaging technique without X-rays and a hand-held device to test hearing.

The Awards ceremony took place at the Honorary Artillery Company grounds in central London, with an audience of 800 business leaders, medical and scientific experts and policy makers. It was hosted by TV presenter Melanie Sykes and comedian David Mitchell, and (being also a charity fundraiser) was attended by celebrities including broadcasters Andrew Marr, Jonathan Ross and Anthea Turner.

Rewarding innovation

Dentistry and Oral Health & NHS Technology Innovation

The Medical Futures Innovation Awards aim to help innovators bridge the gap between medical invention and market access. By entering the Awards process, clinicians and researchers gain the opportunity to pitch their ideas Dragon’s Den-style to a panel of experts who offer guidance and validation.

The judging panels are composed of over 80 medical, scientific and business experts, including Sir Bruce Keogh, Medical Director of the NHS; leading scientist Baroness Susan Greenfield, Director of the Royal Institution; and business leader Sir Richard Sykes. The judges select winners based on three main criteria: novelty, impact on patient care and viability (whether clinical, technical or commercial).

As well as publicity and critical endorsement, winners gain a bespoke package of support to turn their ideas into viable propositions for investors. This may include assistance in securing funding and introductions to professional and commercial contacts. Past winners have gained over £80m of funding, and many now provide successful products or services.

Technologies for tomorrow

The overall winners for 2008, selected from a thousand entries, included:

Cancer Innovation

Cancer Innovation Awards 2008 – Dr. Nick Miller-Jones and Lawrence Fenelon, UroSens Ltd, Cambridge.
Device to diagnose bladder cancer: a point of care test that detects the presence of a protein marker in a urine sample, removing the need for cytoscopy.

Cardiovascular Innovation Awards 2008 – Michael Schneider, Dorian Haskard and Ranil de Silva, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London.
Cell therapy to improve cardiac repair: a new technique for grafting heart stem cells into injured cardiac muscle.

Ophthalmology Innovation Awards 2008 – Robert Johnston, Consultant Ophthalmologist, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Medical Director Medisoft Ltd and David Johnston, CEO Medisoft Ltd.
MediSoft: an electronic patient record system for eye departments, overcoming the difficulties of paper-based notes.

Dentistry and Oral Health & NHS Technology Innovation Awards 2008 – Dr Christopher Longbottom, Prof John Girkin, Prof Nigel Pitts and Dr Simon Poland, Dundee University and Strathclyde University.
Infrared dental imaging: a device that enables dentists to produce images of teeth, bones and gums using infrared light.

ENT & Audiology Innovation Awards 2008 – Mr Jonathan Scotchbrook, Martin Simpson, Gary Norman, Sensaurial Ltd, Oxford.
Hand-held hearing test: a device to make the diagnosis of hearing loss quicker, easier and more sensitive.

Orthopaedic Innovation

Orthopaedic Innovation Awards 2008 – Professor Kevin Shakesheff, University of Nottingham, Michael Leek, Cheryl Hunter and Helen Cox, Regentec Ltd, Nottingham.
Injectable bone: a synthetic, biodegradable synthetic liquid bone graft that hardens after injection.

Homegrown talent

Mr. Andy Goldberg, MD FRCS (TR&Orth), founder of Medical Futures, commented: “The brightest and best of British medical and scientific talent have astounded us with their award-winning innovations that are so full of promise and have the capacity to transform patients’ lives.

“I hope that the winners will also win recognition from the business and investment community to support their translation into commercially viable products, services and businesses,” he said. “We want to ensure that UK healthcare innovations and their wealth creation capability stay in this country for the benefit of UK patients and those around the world.”

 

Tags:

Medtech Features

OT Reviews

by Admin 1. January 2009 23:02
 

 

Time Management for Dummies
by Clare Evans ( Wiley, pb, £9.99 )

Ever had the feeling you really should get to grips with time management, read a book about it maybe, but there just aren’t enough hours in the day? This new addition to the successful For Dummies series (which helped Ross and Rachel get back together) may be the key. Its modular structure, with chapters broken down into sections and points presented as lists, allows you to dip in and out and to make notes quickly and easily. This is good news for anyone who is struggling.

The content of this guide is very sound: essential principles such as setting your goals and organising your day are clearly explained, and effective management of the ‘to do’ list (which many people handle badly) is discussed. There’s a helpful section on how to make efficient use of your e-mail account, so that it saves you time instead of being a black hole into which your time disappears. The final chapter explains how new technologies such as PDAs and memory sticks can make your working life easier.

This book could be a lifesaver for someone entering healthcare sales or marketing from another line of work; or someone who has developed ‘tunnel vision’ and cannot break bad habits; or someone struggling to get the best from new technology. It addresses the reader directly, helping them to embed clear thinking in their everyday work.

However, if you have been trained in time management for your role and are used to organising your workload, this book will only spell out what you already do every day. Also, it doesn’t look at the different kinds of time management challenge that might arise with a change in role – for example, having to think in terms of yearly rather than monthly targets.

But this isn’t a book for professionals who are well versed in time management. It’s a book for people looking for guidance. Dummies may need this book to help them crack time management problems, but only fools would expect such problems to solve themselves.

Michael Tinkler is Business Development Manager for On Target.

On Target special offer
Wiley is offering a free copy of Time Management for Dummies to the first 3 On Target readers who answer this question correctly: Who wrote the song ‘Who Knows Where the Time Goes ’? Send your answer to: joel.lane@healthpublishing.co.uk.

The Age of Aging by George Magnus ( Wiley, hb, £17.95 )

The Age of Aging Over the next two decades, the UK’s population of over-65s will grow in numbers by more than half. The increase in population of those under 18 will barely register. We can’t ignore the numbers. How will Western society adapt as Silver Savers outnumber our children? And how will that single statistic affect healthcare on our doorstep?

Around three years ago, George Magnus was asked to produce research reports on some of the major economic and market consequences of demographic change and population aging. Those thoughts became the dramatic spur for his intensely readable, utterly disturbing and optimistically redemptive book The Age of Aging (subtitled How Demographics are Changing the Global Economy and Our World).

Demographics make a difference because they put so much on the slide: birth, death, disease, migration. All play their part because, where aging happens at a variable rate across the globe, the close bond between demographics and gerontology cannot be ignored. Are countries like Japan, where aging is most pronounced, exporting it to less developed nations unprepared for a geriatric onslaught?

A little over 300 years ago, just 4% of the world’s people were over 65; by 2100, over 20% of us will have reached that age. The NHS has noted that cases of heart failure will increase by over 50% between now and 2031. How can that healthcare burden, in terms of both finance and workload, be shouldered?

Magnus’ book is not all dark sky, and his style is authoritative but amenable. In conclusion, he borrows Bill Clinton’s 1991 statement that we should “reinvent government to help solve the problems of real people”, using this to offer the notion that our own children have the power to engineer social change for the benefit of every generation.

David Learner is Business Development and Resourcing Manager at Delta Consultants.

On Target special offer winners: free copies of The Little Book of Medical Breakthroughs by Dr Naomi Craft were won by Ivan Clark, Cristina McDowall and Kristell Renault. Will it be you next time?

 

Tags:

Medtech Features

A Day in the Life

by Admin 1. January 2009 23:00
 

In the tenth of our series on healthcare industry professionals, David Bowie, Head of Sales & Marketing for medical device company Aircraft Medical, talks to On Target about his working life.

How has your role changed with the increasing success of Aircraft Medical?

One thing is that the travelling hasn’t decreased, but it has changed. It’s becoming more focused on serving our established and growing international distribution network, and also looking to develop new geographical partners throughout the world.

With the success of our product, the McGrath Series 5 Portable Laryngoscope, I’m now in a position to build a full Sales & Marketing team at Aircraft – because obviously we need to support our customer and distributor base. I’m now able to develop in-field support as well as support at our HQ in Edinburgh. Ultimately my role is now starting to become more strategic, as it needs to be.

In the early days, I’m proud to say, I sold the very first McGrath products myself. We were a very small company then. Now we have a network of distributors in 18 countries. So within the last two to three years, we’ve grown from a sales team of one to an effective international sales team of more than 100.

Who are your target customers? How do you reach them?

Our main end-user customers are anaesthetists, and more generally anyone involved in intubation, as well as our distributors. The McGrath Video 5 Portable Laryngoscope is aimed at overcoming issues of difficult intubations, both expected and unanticipated. So we start with anaesthetists, who are intubating day in and day out; but we’re also starting to target intensivists, emergency doctors and paramedics – and we’re finding that the McGrath is in many ways being used as a routine airway tool.

The main way to reach these customers is to raise the awareness of the McGrath product at key international congresses, airway workshops and symposia. We’ve also now built a network of international KOLs, which has led to a number of clinical studies being published; and there’s a large number that are still under way, and new ones starting all the time.

One of the things we’ve been focused on doing from the early stages is building a strong company and product brand image. This is refl ected in all our marketing communications, whether at exhibitions, electronically via e-mail or the web, or in terms of our product design and packaging. We work with exclusive distributors in each of our target markets; they are trained by us and given all the support that they need to sell the product. That’s been a crucial part of our success. We’ve vetted over 300 distribution companies so far, and taken the time to make sure that we get the right partners. Having a careful approach has been crucial to our successes to date.

What happens in your typical working week? What challenges do you face?

There is absolutely no such thing as a typical working week for me! In the past few weeks, for instance, it’s been a complete mixture. I attended the American Society of Anaesthesiologists in Orlando, Florida, with some members of my Sales and Marketing team and our Design team, together with our USA distribution partner. We showcased the McGrath on our own in-house designed exhibition stand where we took 600 square feet of space, which is pretty bold for a small company.

Then I was back in Scotland for a few days, before heading off again to Sydney to visit our newly appointed distributor and introduce them to my new Asia Pacific Regional Sales Manager, and attend a couple of exhibitions and workshops out there. On the way back I spent a couple of days in Singapore, finalising the details for one of our first Asia Pacific distribution partners there. So it’s been a very exciting last few weeks, a little tiring – Q4 is a very busy time of year for exhibitions – a lot of weekends, a lot of international travel. This week I’m in the office for four days to catch up on paperwork, make sure everything’s working fine with my team, address particular issues with them if necessary, and plan things for next year. That gives you a flavour of the things I get involved in.

As regards challenges, I think my main challenge now is to continue to build our coverage and build a successful team to service the market. We need to continue to grow the market; and we have ambitious targets in terms of being number one globally in our particular field, so we need to stay ahead of the competition. My role will continue to grow, as it will for the rest of the company. That’s what excites me: to continue to grow with Aircraft Medical.

 

Tags:

Medtech Features

News Company & Careers

by Admin 1. January 2009 22:51

B.Braun Medical celebrates 10 years in the UK

Hans Hux B.Braun Medical is celebrating ten years as one of the fastest-growing healthcare companies in the UK.

The UK arm of the global healthcare giant saw sales leap by 35% to £83.1 million during 2007 and, despite continued pressure on costs, anticipates further expansion.

B.Braun Medical was formed ten years ago with the amalgamation of all Braun businesses in the UK and the transfer of products, services and people to a purpose-built headquarters and manufacturing plant in Sheffield.

Hans Hux, Group Chief Executive, said: “Back in 1998 our business portfolio as a B.Braun group was very limited. Five or six years ago we started to change the company to focus on innovation and new business. From being a stable generic business we are now a very attractive, innovative company. Two thirds of our business is new products introduced to the market over the last four or five years.”

B.Braun Medical’s growth strategy has combined targeted acquisitions with a focus on innovation and diversification. It has brought a range of successful new product lines and therapies to market – including the award-winning OrthoPilot surgical navigation system, a market-leading safety cannula that saves healthcare workers from the risk of needlestick injuries.

Work has started on a new Aseptic Unit at B.Braun’s Sheffield headquarters, which will feature drug preparation robots capable of manipulating highly toxic and time-sensitive drugs for people undergoing chemotherapy treatment.

New addition to Talley Group Board

Kevin Mearns has been appointed to the Board of Directors of Talley Group Ltd, a developer, manufacturer and marketer of innovative wound care medical devices for community and hospital care.

Chris Evans, Talley Group’s CEO, said: “Kevin has worked within the wound care industry for over 15 years and has previously held positions at Pegasus and Hill-Rom. He joined Talley Medical in 2001 as Marketing Manager and was appointed Group Operations Manager in 2006.

“For the past 18 months Kevin has been working in a more strategic role, and has been dealing externally with highlevel management from other companies within this market sector,” he added. “We are delighted to appoint him to the Board of Directors.”

Kevin Mearns The new position of Operations Director will focus on developing and driving global business strategy and operational excellence to support the increasing global business, as well as looking at potential areas within the wound care market where the company can use its design, development and manufacturing skills to further accelerate growth.

Talley Group Ltd is the UK’s largest privatelyowned specialist in pressure ulcer prevention and therapy.

Xograph expands Veterinary Division

Medical imaging company Xograph Healthcare has appointed a new Territory Manager for its expanding veterinary operations.

Martin Weston Martin Weston has joined Xograph Healthcare as Veterinary Manager covering the South of England, making him the latest employee to join the growing Sales and Marketing team.

Encouraged by current developments, the company is now actively looking to recruit additional team members as the company expands its operations within the veterinary market.

Martin joins Xograph Healthcare from QCR and Trio Diagnostics in York, where he gained experience and substantial knowledge of the veterinary industry. Utilising his experience and connections, Martin will be developing new opportunities for Xograph Healthcare and growing the veterinary division.

Nigel Darwell-Stone, Business Manager for Xograph Healthcare’s Veterinary Division, said: “Martin Weston is an important addition to our growing veterinary team. His broad experience and knowledge of the veterinary market will complement the existing team of staff who are dedicated in providing the very best products and services to veterinary establishments.”

Xograph Healthcare is a leading independent medical equipment supplier to the UK. Its range of medical imaging systems includes general, surgical, mobile, mammography, dental and ultrasound imaging equipment, as well as healthcare IT and direct digital imaging solutions.

Ossur makes bionic footprint in history

Tim McCarthy and April Holmes Prosthetics and bionics company Ossur has been recognised with a Charles D. Siegal President’s Award from the Disability Rights Legal Center (DRLC) in the USA.

Tim McCarthy, Vice President of Prosthetics for Ossur Americas, accepted the award at the DRLC’s Annual Gala in Los Angeles from April Holmes, Paralympic Games gold medallist and the fastest female amputee in the world.

McCarthy and his team are credited with leading the industry into the bionic age of prosthetics with Ossur’s three groundbreaking product launches: the Rheo Knee, the Power Knee and the Proprio Foot. All three products have gained international recognition and acclaim.

April Holmes is a member of Team Ossur, a group of high-achieving amputee athletes sponsored by Ossur because they embody the company’s aim of helping all disabled people to live a ‘Life without Limitations’.

“The Siegal Award recognises the extraordinary contributions that Ossur and its inventors have made to the world community,” said Paula Pearlman, the DRLC’s Executive Director. “Ossur’s manufacture of prosthetics and bionics – which have effectively revolutionised the way people with mobility disabilities experience the world – reinforces our organisation’s values of inclusion and equality.”

The Disability Rights Legal Center is a non-profit organisation formed in 1975 to represent and promote the legal rights of people with all kinds of disabilities through national programmes.

Tribal appoints expert to care management role

Public services support organisation Tribal Group has created the new role of Director of Wellness and Care Management Services within its growing health practice.

Phyllis Shelton has been appointed to lead this new service to the NHS and employers. The service focuses on how to keep people well and how to better manage diagnosed conditions to improve people’s quality of life, reduce pressure on the NHS and improve productivity in the workplace.

Phyllis joins Tribal from the Department of Health, where she worked as the lead for measurement on the Integrated Care Organisation (ICO) programme. Prior to this, she was the founder and Managing Director of Health Dialog UK, a subsidiary of one of the largest care management organisations in the USA.

Matthew Swindells, Managing Director for Health at Tribal, said: “Phyllis Shelton’s expertise makes her the ideal person to lead on our new offering to the NHS and employers – to maximise people’s quality of life and to improve the employers’ productivity by helping them have a healthier workforce.”

Phyllis added: “This is a really important service. Particularly during the credit crunch, employers need to reduce absenteeism and enhance the contribution of their workforce, whilst staff need to be supported in managing stress and their own health better.”

Gloucestershire-based Tribal Group offers a range of consulting, support and delivery services focused on improving the delivery of public services.

Kirkham Young supports new businesses

Specialist healthcare recruitment company Kirkham Young has been invited to support new businesses through The Prince’s Trust.

Alan Dias and partner Tara Kirkham Young has joined the 500 Business Club, a group of South- Eastern businesses that have all contributed an equal amount as a consortium to support The Prince’s Trust.

The Prince’s Trust business programme provides money, support and guidance to young people wanting to start up in business. The Trust predominantly helps people aged from 16–30, enabling them to make a real difference to their professional lives.

“As a company starting up just over four years ago, we know how valuable any input and support can be, making The Prince’s Trust organisation an ideal charity for us to support,” commented Director Sam Kirkham. “We really do enjoy supporting worthwhile initiatives, and to be to able to be part of the 500 Business Club offers us the opportunity to give something back to our local community.”

The photograph shows Alan Dias, Scientific Recruitment Manager at Kirkham Young, and partner Tara at The Prince’s Trust 500 Business Club launch dinner in London.

Kirkham Young also supports local charities, including a children’s hospice and a local minis rugby team.

Tags:

Medtech Features

The roads to market

by Admin 1. January 2009 22:49
 

Do specialist medtech SMEs have more trouble gaining market access than major healthcare corporations? Terry Young of the MATCH project discusses the challenges and rewards of going it alone as a small company.

For a small medtech company, developing a product that is technically and clinically effective may well be relatively straightforward: that level of expertise and innovation is why the company exists. But from there, the SME may find its route to market obstructed by complex regulatory and procurement barriers. The streamlined company structure and technical focus that helped the SME develop its products may prove handicaps in the struggle for market access. Is there a way through?

Professor Terry Young is Chair of Healthcare Systems at the School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics, Brunel University, and Coordinating Director of the MATCH project, which provides guidance on innovation and commissioning for medtech SMEs and start-ups. He explains how SMEs can get through the crosstown traffic between them and their customers: with the road map of value-based assessment.

How can smaller companies overcome regulatory and procurement hurdles?

From discussion with companies (and especially those which subscribe to MATCH as network partners), I am aware of three areas where small companies may struggle.

The first area is the regulation associated with obtaining a CE Mark. The second involves setting an acceptable price for the product – which links to the third, more general question of how to demonstrate value for money (VFM) through a NICE-type appraisal method. While many products do not yet undergo such an appraisal process, it is becoming clearer that firms will need to furnish evidence of VFM. Clearly, value is easier to demonstrate at lower prices, and companies are starting to look at pricing strategies that maximise the chance of reimbursement or endorsement following a NICE-type appraisal without needlessly throwing away profits.

At first sight this looks likely to complicate matters for smaller companies, since alongside securing finance, protecting their positions on intellectual property and garnering evidence of safety and performance, they will face the challenge of managing a position on evidence of VFM. However, using effective tools to perform cost-benefit analysis at a very early stage means that time often wasted in remedial activity can be used early on to set a better design agenda. Also, since cost-effectiveness analysis relies heavily on evidence that is increasingly needed in any case, it is possible that the whole process, properly integrated and streamlined, will not increase the overall workload.

This insight needs to be factored into the business planning. Since investors often specialise in a specific phase of a product’s development, having a clear position on the development and articulation of value is a big advantage in securing funding and then selling on to the next stage of investor.

Is it better to become part of a larger corporation or to go it alone?

That is for each company to decide! By being able to furnish evidence and to demonstrate a robust process of acquiring and analysing evidence, companies put themselves in a much stronger position strategically with agencies such as NICE – and tactically when negotiating with local procurement groups.

Terry Young In the first phase of the MATCH project (2003–2008), some smaller companies expressed reservations about working closely with larger companies; but in practice we were not aware of tension. Some companies even ended up undertaking projects for some of the larger companies, though that was more serendipitous than planned. It seems to me that there are lots of ways in which smaller companies might coexist with bigger companies.

Since many small companies have a trade sale as a possible exit strategy, the ability to be in control of one’s destiny, articulating value to customers, suppliers and investors alike, has to be of great benefit.

What does ‘innovation’ really mean in market terms?

‘Innovation’ is a buzzword just now, and as such it tends to mean different things to different people. Clearly, it carries the idea of doing new things. I like to think of innovation at two levels.

In terms of services, we tend to think of improvement methods – which date back to the end of the last century, when the Modernisation Agency and others were pressing hard for a new emphasis on process. Learning and, indeed, learning how to learn have become popular pursuits, and are making their mark in the delivery of care. Of course, not all socalled ‘improvement’ really works out. Call centres, for instance, may have brought great benefit to banks and insurance companies, but they are not always popular with customers.

In terms of technology, innovation tends to focus on invention. However, the new does not always outperform the old – and indeed, the best technical solution does not always enjoy the commercial success it merits.

The critical element, when we change the way we do things or the technology with which we do them, is to have a way to measure whether the new is better, worse, easier or genuinely cheaper than what it replaces – and for whom. This is why HTA, economic evaluation and a formal means of addressing the needs of users are critical. If we have a scale by which we can know when an innovation has resulted in better outcomes or experiences, or has lowered the cost of care or the time taken to deliver it, then we can move forward.

Unless there is a very free and mature market, the industry (and particularly small companies) will struggle to realise the benefits of innovation. Good news stories and simple narratives of impact are not enough when tens of thousands of people may be using a device over decades. It is interesting, for instance, to follow the debate over the value of implantable cardio-defibrillators, where some recent HTA analysis suggests that lowering the cost would still have a much better impact on cost-effectiveness than improving the performance. On the other hand, it might be argued that industry has had to innovate without solid guidelines, because the evidence has taken so long to accrue.

We have a chance to put many aspects of healthcare innovation onto a common footing and, for the first time, apply real value assessment every time we believe we have achieved an innovation.

“We have a chance to put many aspects of healthcare innovation onto a common footing and, for the first time, apply real value assessment every time we believe we have achieved an innovation.”

How can you make being a smaller company work for you?

It is easy for us to offer suggestions, but much harder for those who have taken the risks to make it work. In the spirit of the question, however, here are some ideas that might help.

1. Take at least a little time to consider what a move to evidence-based supply and purchasing might mean to your company. This might include:
a) Updating your skills audit to make sure that the requisite skills are in house or that you have access to them through trusted partners.
b) Ensuring that you have a clear costbenefit analysis (however rudimentary) that connects to clinical outcomes in the context of a known or planned-for delivery paradigm.
c) Thinking about the role that users have played in your design, and how their views will influence the final product.

2. Make provision in next year’s budget for at least some of the following:
a) Skills development to understand value-based decision-making in design.
b) An audit with an external specialist of your design process and your methods for articulating value.
c) Attending a conference where academics and industry will meet to discuss what is happening now, and to spot trends for the future.
d) Purchasing or commissioning supporting materials (guides, workbooks etc) for your entire workforce.
e) A day away with other members of your supply chain.

3. Do some basic scenario planning around your business plan to include the following types of questions:
a) What could I do better to free up resources for evidence collection and analysis of value?
b) Is it possible to re-plan my route to market so that I spend a little more up front and reduce the cost of market and after-sales services?
c) What have the big bought-in items been up to now, and what do I expect them to be in five years’ time?

MATCH (Multidisciplinary Assessment of Technology Centre for Healthcare) is a research collaboration between four UK universities involved in healthcare technology assessment and a cohort of industrial match partners. MATCH aims to transform the medical devices sector by researching, testing and making methods available to cut the time and cost from concept to continuous improvement in the market, in support of medical device users, the industry, regulators, reimbursement agencies and healthcare providers. For more details, visit www.match.ac.uk

 

Tags:

Medtech Features

Medtech fights back: this time it’s personal

by Admin 1. January 2009 22:41
 

 

Despite the cold economic climate, the UK medtech sector is keeping up the heat with its technological and commercial innovation. Peter Ellingworth, the new Chief Executive of the Association of British Healthcare Industries (ABHI), talks to On Target about the opportunities and challenges facing the industry in 2009.

What prospects and challenges does the next year hold for the UK medtech industry?

For medical technology, the priority is facing the challenges presented by the current economic and funding climate. Lord Darzi’s recent NHS Next Stage Review showed the acknowledgement at a very senior level within the Department of Health that value, not unit cost, is the driver for procurement. We continue to seek ways to enable our members to have access to funding opportunities and to continue to grow.

Despite the current economic climate, the prospects for the UK medical technology sector do look positive. Relative to its size, the UK is an unusually fruitful source of medtech innovation. Britain’s 2000 medtech companies employ nearly 50,000 people, making up 14% of the entire European employment total in that sector.

Medical technology firms must work to stimulate exports – a process that ABHI supports through our Export Club, assistance provided to firms exhibiting abroad, and our continuing involvement with UKTI.

“I would strongly advise all organisations to make sure their business plans include clearly identifiable health, economic and patient benefits. This will mean that true value can be achieved for the product they are attempting to commercialise.”

What overall business strategy do UK medtech companies need in order to survive the recession?

Companies must focus on the rapid and broad adoption of technologies they are commercialising. In order to achieve that, a strong focus must be placed on evidence to support any assessment processes they have undergone. Secondly, companies must work to identify new markets for their products. It is crucial for UK firms to open up new markets and gain as much coverage for their products as possible.

ABHI is constantly working to make the UK a fertile environment for innovative technologies, enabling them to be rapidly adopted. We are working closely with Government and DH-associated agencies to highlight the critical issues affecting our sector, including work to improve sector metrics that will allow both Government and industry to accurately quantify the costs and benefits of the early adoption of medical technologies.

What advice would you give to medtech SMEs and start-ups trying to develop their business in the current economic climate?

Firstly, I would strongly advise all organisations to make sure their business plans include clearly identifiable health, economic and patient benefits. This will mean that true value can be achieved for the product they are attempting to commercialise.

By working with ABHI Special Interest Sections and a number of working groups, firms will be able to ensure they have access to the latest market intelligence. Additionally, we at ABHI are working with government bodies to ensure that SMEs have access to finance. In particular, we are working closely with the Department for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform (BERR) to draw up a clear route map to support SMEs. We are constantly working to promote the value of SMEs to the UK economy as a source of innovation, employment and export potential.

What areas of the healthcare market are growing fastest for UK companies? What are the reasons?

Current healthcare policy emphasises a shift from late-stage treatment options towards health at earlier stages, supported by new applications of technologies and by the recognition that early intervention is better and can take place nearer the home than hospital treatment.

Peter Ellingworth These technologies can support a shift to lower-cost ways of delivering treatments, while contributing to improvements in patient outcomes in the areas of healthcare that are likely to witness the largest growth in demand over the next few years. Prediction and early diagnosis, followed by timely intervention, are well established as a means of reducing ongoing mortality, morbidity and cost of disease management. Moves towards earlier diagnosis and risk management of patients may lead to the elimination of interventions altogether, or the use of much less invasive procedures in lower-cost settings that generate significantly better outcomes. This will be coupled with the rapid development of aids to living with chronic conditions in the community via tele-enabled diagnostics, therapies and assistive technologies.

ABHI is working to ensure that clinicians and commissioners of services are able to utilise fully the potential benefits of medical technology when looking to make the shift towards earlier intervention. Through our lobbying work and involvement with the Ministerial Medical Technology Strategy Group, which provides a conduit for communication between industry and Government ministers, we work to ensure that SMEs are involved in procurement processes, that Government funding for innovation also promotes adoption, and that the regulatory environment contributes to UK leadership in medical technology and innovation.

Lord Darzi’s Next Stage Review promised to place innovation and quality at the heart of the NHS. What progress has been made towards that goal?

Lord Darzi’s review puts in place a legal requirement for the NHS to promote innovation. It is understood by the ABHI that this includes technologies as well as “organisation and methods”. The review recognises that the uptake of innovative treatments in the NHS is patchy. In order to counter this and champion best practice, Payment by Results (PbR) will have a focus on clinically and cost effective approaches through the Best Practice Tariffs programme.

During the Queen’s speech in December, it was announced there will be a Health Bill. This bill is set to put into legislation many of the proposals made in the NHS Next Stage Review, including the NHS Constitution. The ABHI will be monitoring developments to ensure that the legislation resembles the positive proposals set out in the review, and is effective in ensuring that “clinically and cost effective innovation are adopted”.

Since the publication of the Next Stage Review in June 2008, the ABHI has been leading the establishment of four streams of work addressing the innovation and quality aspects of Lord Darzi’s report, under the oversight of the Ministerial Medical Technology Strategy Group and co-chaired by the Health Minister and an industry leader. The four workstreams address:
1. Simplifying the pathway to take-up of innovative technology through more systematic evaluation, and increasing the number of products undergoing evaluation.
2. Making procurement more receptive to innovation.
3. Increasing the ‘pull’ effect of the system to support intelligent demand in the NHS.
4. Developing metrics to measure the uptake of technology.
Progress on these workstreams was reported to Lord Darzi in November, and the work proceeds.

What are ABHI’s priorities for its members in the coming year?

The core mission for the association is to provide a strong voice for our members, focused on enabling innovation for the benefit of patients and efficient, effective healthcare. Our policy work will focus on the development of a policy that takes into account clinicians’ need for innovation, ensures clear pathways to market for suppliers and pays attention to the contribution of SMEs.

We will also be working to ensure that medical device regulation remains appropriate, proportionate and sustainable by influencing UK regulators and the European Union legislative process. And finally, we will reinforce industry integrity and high ethical standards through the operation and enforcement of the ABHI Code of Business Practice.



The Association of British Healthcare Industries (ABHI) is the leading trade association for medical technology companies in the UK. Look out for an article on the ABHI Code of Business Practice in On Target this spring.

 

Tags:

Medtech Features

It could be EU

by Admin 1. January 2009 22:37

Forget the credit crunch: this could be a year of real opportunities for the medtech industry. With health economics a hot issue and reimbursement set to remain a major challenge for the sector, On Target takes a look at the growing role of HTAs for medical devices in Europe. If you can get your value proposition right, your lottery numbers might just come up in 2009.

The global economy, rather like most of the adult population, started 2009 with an extremely sore head. With economists issuing gloomy forecasts and talk of a recession lasting well into 2010, the fiscal hangover promises to be a stubborn one. But not, apparently, for the global medical device sector. In fact, medtech has started the New Year in a remarkably optimistic mood. As we have already seen in the first two articles of our series Devices in Demand , the combination of an ageing global population and increased spending on medical technologies has driven comparatively enviable growth in medical device sales in the current climate. Moreover, the prospects for 2009 remain good.

A recent global survey of over 1000 medical device manufacturers, distributors and service providers has revealed high levels of positivity across the industry. The poll, conducted by medical device consulting firm Emergo Group, found that 61% of the companies were anticipating sales growth in 2009, while 84% expected to maintain or increase employee headcount during the year. Only 9% expected sales to fall.

Encouragingly, the survey (conducted in mid-October last year) showed that almost two thirds of the respondents (61%) had reported domestic sales and orders in the previous three months to be at a normal level or higher.

The value proposition

With almost a fifth (18%) of the survey respondents being in Europe outside the UK, the outlook for European medtech appears much rosier than in other sectors – some of which endured a torrid 2008, with average sales declines of 20–25%.

John Wilkinson, former Director General of the ABHI and now Chief Executive of Eucomed (the trade association for European medtech companies), told On Target that future prospects were good, but that convergence across the region meant that businesses needed to ensure they got their value propositions right to make the most of the opportunities. “The prospects are very good, because increasingly clinical practice across Europe is getting more similar, so a solution developed in one country is more readily acceptable across other parts of Europe. Without question, there is a real convergence there,” he said. “The key to the introduction of any medical technology is how you get the value proposition across. That will vary from economy to economy around Europe. If you can sell it in one part of the EU, then you can sell it in most of the EU.”

Developing ‘value propositions’ is now a critical success factor for businesses, as health economics has emerged as a key consideration in the uptake of medical products and technologies. The rapid onset of Health Technology Assessments (HTAs) for medical devices has further underlined the need for medtech companies to develop robust value propositions in order to appeal to the ‘payers’ who now significantly influence product usage. In the process, planning for HTA success has become a central plank of companies’ market access strategies across Europe.

With widespread cost-containment policies driving down healthcare budgets across the region, developing a ‘cost-effective message’ to satisfy payers’ needs is now an imperative in the preparation of value propositions. Without one, the holy grail of reimbursement may well be unattainable.

For pan-European market penetration, however, the challenge is to ensure that your approach is appropriate for the markets you are targeting. “You really need to have a good understanding of reimbursement systems around Europe, which are quite variable,” says John Wilkinson. “Your strategy needs to be well attuned to the local reimbursement systems and their peculiarities.”

Reimbursement and HTA

Until recently, HTA has largely (though not exclusively) focused on pharmaceuticals. However, it has begun to play an increasing role in determining which medical technologies are available to patients throughout Europe. It is already clear that adopting the pharmaceutical model for medical device assessments is not appropriate and will not work.

So what is HTA? The International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment defines HTA as: “The systematic evaluation of properties, effects, and/or impacts of healthcare technology.
It may address the direct, intended consequences of technologies as well as their indirect, unintended consequences. Its main purpose is to inform technology-related policy making in healthcare. HTA is conducted by interdisciplinary groups using explicit analytical frameworks drawing from a variety of methods.”

In the context of policy, HTA is mainly applied by healthcare payers making decisions on the appropriate use, coverage or reimbursement of new technologies at different times in the medical device life cycle. Formal assessment of technologies usually occurs at a national level, though HTA is increasingly being applied at regional and local levels (for example, within individual hospitals). HTA is also used to help inform best practice through the development of evidence-based guidelines.

A recent global survey of over 1000 medical device manufacturers, distributors and service providers found that 61% of the companies were anticipating sales growth in 2009, while 84% expected to maintain or increase employee headcount during the year.

What HTA is for

In its recent positioning paper on the subject, Eucomed endorses the value of HTA – noting how it is influencing the degree to which technologies are adopted in practice, and also highlighting the key tenets it considers vital to the appropriate application of HTA for medical devices. The central issue, it appears, is the type and quality of data required to ensure the success of the process – and, most significantly, the data’s availability at the time of assessment.

“The application of HTA to medical devices is challenging,” Eucomed says. “HTA is a data driven process and many HTA agencies adopt a strict adherence to the hierarchy of evidence, demanding that technologies are supported by evidence from robust, randomised controlled trials. For many medical technologies and surgical interventions, such evidence is often limited or unavailable at the time of launch. Adopting a pharmaceutical paradigm, based on an expectation of multiple randomized controlled trials being available at the time of launch, may lead to restrictions on access to many new medical technologies. A device specific assessment paradigm must be recognised.”

Eucomed identifies the main purposes of HTA as being:
• To support patient access to innovative technologies by promoting the use of technologies that are clinically and cost effective.
• To provide a mechanism that supports disinvestment in current services and technologies that are cost ineffective, so creating ‘headroom’ for new technologies when they become available.
• To support payers in making informed decisions on the reimbursement, coverage, adoption and uptake of healthcare technologies.

It is widely accepted that HTA should not be viewed as an additional barrier to regulatory approval: the focuses of regulatory approval for CE marketing (safety, quality and performance) and HTA (clinical and cost effectiveness) are fundamentally different. As such, each process requires different data. “Whilst the data required for regulatory approval are, to some extent, context free, data for HTA are largely context specific – the applicability of the data will depend on local treatment practices, local funding levels and socio-cultural factors,” says Eucomed.

These factors should undoubtedly be taken into consideration during the HTA process. HTA needs to adopt a broad perspective, capturing the impact of new technologies on patients, carers, the health service and society as a whole. Eucomed says it “accepts that healthcare decisionmakers are predominantly interested in the impact of new technologies on healthcare budgets. However, HTA bodies should be encouraged to adopt a social perspective considering the impact of technologies on broader societal costs, such as productivity and social care costs.”

Getting the right data

The availability of appropriate data for HTA remains a concern for the industry. Healthcare decision makers (payers) undoubtedly prefer to undertake HTA early in the life cycle of a technology, and often prior to widespread dissemination. However, appropriate data are not always freely available at this point; the industry is keen to make sure this does not hinder patient access to technologies. “HTA should not restrict access to new technologies that are proven to be safe and efficacious but have limited data on their effectiveness,” says Eucomed. “Clinical and cost effectiveness (as differentiated from efficacy) data are frequently only available after a technology has been in use for a period of time.”

To combat this, and to ensure timely access to promising technologies that have limited but positive effectiveness data to support their use at launch, Eucomed advocates that alternative funding mechanisms may need to be explored. One such mechanism it proposes is coverage with evidence development. This allows a technology to be covered for a period of time during which effectiveness evidence is generated. “Such approaches are associated with both risks and benefits for manufacturers and payers and should be carefully considered prior to implementation.”

NICE decisions on drugs have made headlines – but medtech HTA will not follow the pharma model. Communication between all stakeholders involved in the HTA process – including healthcare practitioners, healthcare planners, payers, patients and manufacturers – needs, of course, to be robust and transparent. This is particularly critical with regard to the timing of HTA. “Discussion between the manufacturer and HTA agency should seek to identify the optimal time to undertake HTA, taking into account the need to inform decisions on adoption with the availability of evidence,” Eucomed says. “This is particularly important when considering devices intended for surgical use, which are often associated with a ‘learning curve’ effect, whereby their effectiveness can only be properly evaluated once healthcare professionals have adjusted their practice to incorporate the new technology. A process of HTA must be completed within a timeframe relevant to the pace of evolution of the technology in question.

“HTA is an iterative process and should be revisited at relevant time-points in the life cycle of a technology to take into account important new evidence. As the major providers of evidence, technology manufacturers should be consulted on the appropriate timing of a ‘life cycle’ HTA.”

Access to innovation

Although it is widely accepted that the pharmaceutical model will not work for medtech, fears over the impact of HTA on medical advancement are shared across both sectors. In the UK, allegations that the work of NICE has restricted patient access to medicines have been ever-present since the organisation’s inception in 1999. Although pharma has fostered a better relationship with NICE and understands why it needs to exist, the rejection of treatments is always a high-profile media story and this is likely to continue. Likewise, in medtech there are inevitable concerns over the impact of HTA on innovation.

Eucomed says that policy-makers must consider the implications of HTA for the environment that is needed to foster innovation of medical devices. “If HTA introduces significant new challenges to market entry then there is a potential that this may impact on the rate of innovation of the device sector, which already faces a number of challenges,” it says. “Intellectual property associated with medical devices is less well-protected than patents on new medical compounds. In addition to this, medical device development is characterised by iterative improvement of technologies resulting in a more rapid life cycle and increased competition.”

Despite these concerns, Eucomed supports a transparent and collaborative partnership on the development of HTA processes and methodologies for appraisal of medical technologies. It accepts the need to develop cost-effective healthcare solutions in the modern era; but it emphasises that the impact of medical devices on all aspects of the operation of the health service cannot be underestimated, and the availability of innovative device technologies is imperative to improving patient outcomes. Striking a balance between these principles is essential, it says. “Eucomed is committed to working with HTA agencies throughout Europe to ensure that HTA is applied appropriately to medical devices. This fosters rapid patient access to effective, reliable and safe technologies. Eucomed’s principles are intended to ensure that the application of HTA encourages the efficient allocation of healthcare resources whilst also acknowledging the value of medical devices innovation in Europe.”

Distribution: the final challenge

Of course, securing reimbursement is not the final piece of the jigsaw for medtech marketers. The issue of distribution looms large. “Companies need a clear distribution strategy,” says John Wilkinson. “However well designed and developed it may be, the big challenge remains: how do you get your product to customers in different countries? Do you need to find distribution partners or do it yourself? There is a wide range of strategic decisions that could vary according to the national system you’re engaging with.”

And so, as the industry begins a new year that many other sectors are facing with trepidation, it would seem there are many reasons for medtech to be relatively cheerful. As John Wilkinson says: “Medtech companies should be optimistic: get out there and challenge some of these markets!”

The dual challenges of reimbursement and distribution will not be easy – but if companies can get their value propositions and distribution strategies right, 2009 could be a surprisingly good year for the bravest in the European sector. Who knows, it could be EU.

To download a copy of the Eucomed Insight HTA Position Paper, please visit www.eucomed.org

Eucomed

 

Tags:

Medtech Features

Editor's Comments

by Admin 1. January 2009 20:35

Editor's comments

 

Value Added Tracks

In a month where a Government minister got shot down by the nation’s media for claiming that the “green shoots of economic recovery” were beginning to show, it would be naïve to suggest that the medical device sector starts 2009 in a buoyant mood. The world is in the grip of an economic crisis, and no industry will be immune from the turbulence that will cause. But despite the gloom, the medtech industry does start the year in comparatively good shape and with plenty of reasons for optimism. The green shoots of recovery, however, these are not. Medtech’s innovative seeds for success were planted years ago. The hope is that they will bear fruit in the next twelve months.

And so, as we embark upon the New Year sales, we face some crucial questions. How are the UK’s medical technologies going to tackle the challenges the current climate brings, help improve health outcomes and, from a business perspective, drive shareholder growth? The successful companies will be those whose products can demonstrate and deliver true value. This month, On Target examines what this truly means.

Lord Darzi’s NHS review last summer demonstrated that, for the Department of Health, value was the central driver for procurement rather than cost. As ABHI’s new Chief Executive, Peter Ellingworth, says in an exclusive interview with On Target , companies are now being urged to ensure that their business plans make provision for clearly identifiable health, economic and patient benefits. Such data will be the key to demonstrating value.

The rapid onset of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) for medical devices is forcing the industry to adopt a new sales and marketing methodology. Until recently, HTA has largely been considered an issue for pharmaceuticals – but across Europe, medical technologies are increasingly finding themselves under the microscope. The key to success is to develop robust value propositions that appeal to the new, influential healthcare stakeholders who hold the purse strings – with the emphasis not necessarily on unit cost, but more importantly on health outcomes. Our article ‘It could be EU’ shows how the European industry is preparing itself for HTA. Recession or no recession, HTA is here to stay.

Finally, we take a look at the fundamentals of marketing and assess what needs to change in these challenging times. Marketing’s chief purpose is to identify and meet customer needs. In such a turbulent economic climate, the customer’s priority is to find a product that is not only safe and clinically effective, but also cost-effective. Developing marketing messages that demonstrate this is central to successful market access. ‘It’s time to plant a tree’ shows that, in an age where “the voice for value is getting louder and louder”, it is imperative for innovations to be customer-focused. 

So your New Year sales are well under way. It’s a tough life out there on the medtech High Street – but if you can identify your customers’ needs and work out how they define ‘value’, your prospects for 2009 will be good.

I wish you all the very best.

Chris Ross
Editor

Tags:

Medtech Features

News

by Admin 1. January 2009 18:47

 





European Commission urges infection control measures

Androulla Vassiliou The European Commission has sent recommendations to national governments in a bid to reduce the frequency of healthcare-acquired infections (HAIs) in Europe.

The Stockholm-based European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control says that one in 20 hospital patients in Europe become infected while in hospital. Such infections are estimated to cause or contribute to 147,000 deaths annually. The Commission calculates that the financial burden of HAIs on European healthcare systems amounts to €5.5bn per year.

EU health commissioner Androulla Vassiliou said: “Patient safety is the cornerstone of good quality healthcare. I would like to see a Europe for patients where safety is paramount and citizens are confident and knowledgeable about the care they receive.”

The Commission points to evidence that 20–30% of HAIs can be prevented, and that the measures are highly cost-effective. It is urging governments to put in place a comprehensive national strategy, developing guidelines on screening and ensuring that infection prevention and control measures are well resourced.

Statistics from the Health Protection Agency (HPA) show that MRSA bloodstream infections in England are continuing to fall: there were 725 such infections in England between July and September, compared with 837 in the previous quarter.

Patient website on hip and knee implants

A new website has been launched to provide independent information for patients undergoing hip and knee replacement surgery in the UK.

The website, www.hipandkneenetwork.co.uk, is part-funded by the EU and employs a panel of orthopaedic surgeons. About 160,000 hip and knee replacements are carried out each year in the UK, and the number has been predicted to treble in the next 20 years.

The Hip and Knee Network enables patients to access data on the quality and take-up of all hip and knee implants on the market. The website is independent of the NHS, private medicine and implant suppliers. All information on the site is produced and/or vetted by the specialist panel.

www.hipandkneenetwork.co.uk

Mr David Stock, an orthopaedic consultant and member of the site’s panel, said: “This project is about creating a community for patients and surgeons involved in hip and knee replacement surgery.” By combining their efforts, he said, the panel will “help patients find the right quality of information.” The site enables patients to search for a surgeon or hospital conducting hip and knee replacement surgery anywhere in the UK, ask the panel a question or take a test to assess their need for hip or knee surgery. It also provides forums for professional debate.

Bomb survivor wears prosthetic arm

Kira Mason A survivor of the 7/7 bombing in London has received a clip-on arm that fuses directly with her own tissue.

Kira Mason, 51, lost her left arm to a bomb in 2005. In a clinical trial, she was given an implant that enables her to attach a prosthetic arm to her own skeleton and skin without causing infection.

The implant technique, known as Intraosseous Transcutaneous Amputation Prosthesis (ITAP), is based on the growth of reindeer antlers. A titanium alloy rod is attached to a bone protruding through the skin, which heals around it. A prosthesis is then attached to the joint, avoiding the discomfort caused by sockets or straps.

“My grandson likes to call me a cyborg,” Mrs Mason said. “But the implant looks and feels much better than the prostheses I’d tried before, and is so convenient. I just wake up, clip on the arm and away I go.”

Battery-powered sensors allow Mrs Mason to grip objects with her artificial hand by flexing her upper arm muscles. “I can hold both a knife and fork to eat and even do delicate tasks such as opening a packet of butter,” she said.

The ITAP was developed by Professor Gordon Blunn of University College London and UK medical device company Stanmore Implants. Researchers believe it could lead to functional replacement limbs that respond to nervous commands.

Cancer strategy review stresses early intervention

Professor Mike Richards The first annual review of the NHS Cancer Reform Strategy identifies early diagnosis and increasing the capacity of radiotherapy services as key priorities.

The NHS cancer reform strategy, published in December 2007, is a five-year plan setting out measures to improve cancer services in England.

The report notes that the national Bowel Cancer Screening Programme launched in 2006 has been rolled out further, with 40 screening centres (by November 2008) leading to the detection of 2000 cancers. By the end of 2009 it should be fully rolled out across England, with 100 screening centres.

A national early diagnosis initiative was launched in 2008 to encourage people to present earlier. Professor Mike Richards, the National Cancer Director, said: “Late diagnosis has been a major factor in poor cancer survival rates, and this initiative should begin to tackle the problem.”

The report says more effort is needed to ensure that radiotherapy services reach the 31-day waiting time target set for 2010. A radiotherapy capacity planning tool will be offered to all centres in spring 2009. The report also notes the need for more training in cancer surgery, including laparoscopic surgery.

“We are on course to meet our target of a reduction of at least 20% in cancer death rates by 2010,” Professor Richards concluded.

Medtech companies in imaging partnership

Two UK medtech companies have formed a partnership to help improve surgical outcomes by providing advanced imaging techniques.

Acrobot Navigator Acrobot, a company specialising in computer-assisted orthopaedic surgical navigation, and Alliance Medical, part of a European medical imaging company that supports more than 400 hospitals and clinics in the UK, will provide orthopaedic surgeons with an integrated process from CT scanning through to navigated joint replacement.

Alliance Medical operates CT scanners that produce data using Acrobot’s Modeller software, enabling it to create 3D models of patients’ anatomy. These models enable surgeons to create ‘Patient Plans’ that can be used to provide detailed component sizing and position using Acrobot’s Planner software. The surgeon can reproduce the plan in theatre using Acrobot Navigator, which will now be available for a wider range of procedures.

Graeme Brookes, CEO of Acrobot, said: “Advanced imaging and modelling has been shown to have a significant effect on surgical outcomes. When orthopaedic components are implanted accurately, the patient’s post-operative recovery time can be reduced and discomfort and complications can be minimised.”

Elaine Head, Head of Alliance Medical Imaging Centres London, said: “Our centres provide easily accessible medical diagnostic modalities to thousands of people, and we are keen to be able to bring new techniques like Acrobot to a wider patient base in the future.”

News in Brief

Scotland has set a six-week target for eight diagnostic tests from April, replacing the current nine-week target. The tests are MRI and CT scans, nonobstetric ultrasound, barium enema, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy and cystoscopy. This follows nationwide success in meeting the current nineweek target.
Vodafone Group has made an undisclosed investment in t+ Medical, a provider of mobile phone-based technology used to transfer patient biometric data. The technology is used by thousands of people in the UK to manage long-term health conditions.
Pathology services in the UK should be transformed to improve quality, safety and efficiency in diagnostic tests, according to a new report by Lord Carter of Coles. The report looks at making services more responsive to patients’ needs. Recommendations include rapid adoption of new technology and enhancing IT connectivity.
St. Jude Medical has acquired two international medtech companies for a total of $533 million: Radi Medical AB of Sweden and MediGuide Inc. of Israel. Radi’s devices include a system used to assess lesions in heart arteries. MediGuide’s medical positioning system uses tiny sensors to navigate inside the body.
Renishaw, a UK medical device company, has invested in neurosurgery robotics. The company has acquired a 75% stake in Swiss company Schaerer Mayfield NeuroMate AG, which has a wholly-owned French subsidiary. The NeuroMate image-guided surgical robot has been used in more than 9000 neurosurgical procedures.

Tags:

Medtech Features

TextBox

Tag cloud

Calendar

<<  May 2013  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789

View posts in large calendar